fermigier 9 hours ago | next |

This discovery was already commented a few months ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41475177

As I wrote in the comments, I was the record holder, twice, in the 90s:

Fermigier, Stéfane - Un exemple de courbe elliptique définie sur Q de rang ≥19. (French) [An example of an elliptic curve defined over Q with rank ≥19] C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 315 (1992), no. 6, 719–722.

Fermigier, Stéfane - Une courbe elliptique définie sur Q de rang ≥22. (French) [An elliptic curve defined over Q of rank ≥22] Acta Arith. 82 (1997), no. 4, 359–363.

wslh 9 hours ago | root | parent | next |

Just saw this, congratulations! Would you mind giving an ELI5 explanation for a wider audience?

lisper 8 hours ago | root | parent | next |

[Not the OP but I think I understand it well enough to take a whack at an ELI5.]

Elliptic curves are a particular kind of cubic equation, exactly like the quadratic equations you studied in junior high algebra, except with one term being raised to the third power instead of just squared (and a few other conditions). It turns out that these equations have vastly more complicated behavior than quadratics and give rise to a whole host of problems that mathematicians are still working to solve. One of the interesting problems arises when you ask: what are the solutions to the equation if we restrict ourselves only to rational numbers? It turns out that rational solutions to elliptic curve equations can be grouped into families of solutions where each member of the family can be derived from other members by linear operations (addition and multiplication by a constant). The number of such families of solutions is called the rank of the equation. (Note: it's actually a little more complicated than that, but that's the gist of it. See [1] if you want the details.)

It is observed empirically (by solving lots of elliptic curve equations) that the rank tends to be small. Indeed, the elliptic curve that made the news did so because it has a rank of 29, the largest rank currently known. But no one knows if this is the biggest possible (almost certainly not) or if there is an upper bound on the possible rank of an elliptic curve. Solving that would win you a Fields medal.

(Note: there are results on the upper bound of the average rank of families of elliptic curves [2] but that is not the same as an absolute upper bound.)

---

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_of_an_elliptic_curve

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_of_an_elliptic_curve#Uppe...

fsckboy an hour ago | root | parent | next |

>Solving that would win you a Fields medal

it would not win me a Fields medal: ageism, it's only for under 40s.

eddd-ddde 7 hours ago | root | parent | prev |

For the longest time I thought elliptic curves where quadratic curves.

Wouldn't it had been more accurate to name them elliptic surfaces?

CarpaDorada 4 hours ago | root | parent | prev | next |

They're curves (one-dimensional), not surfaces. An example of an elliptic curve is y^2 = x^3 + 1. The polynomial P(x,y) = x^3 + 1 - y^2 has degree 3. A surface is a 2 dimensional geometric shape.

QuesnayJr 6 hours ago | root | parent | prev |

Just to be clear, an ellipse is a quadratic curve. Ellipses are not elliptic curves. (They are still curves, though, as long as you restrict to plugging in real numbers, not complex.) The terminology is unfortunate.

fermigier 8 hours ago | root | parent | prev |

Well, the basics, oversimplified, are this:

- In general, elliptic curves are solutions of P(x, y) = 0 where P is a polynomial of degree 3 in two variables. "Points" on the curve are solutions of this equation.

- If you intersect an elliptic curve with a straight line, you end up with a polynomial in one variable, of degree 3 (in general). Since a polynomial of degree 3 has 3 solutions (in the appropriate context), this means that if you have two points on the curve, and you draw a line through these two points, there is a third aligned with them which belongs to the curve. So we have an operation on the curve, which to every pair of points associates a third point. This can be explicitly calculated.

- It can be proven (again, by explicit calculation) that this operation is associative and commutative, and that there is a "zero" element, i.e. that this operation forms a "group".

Now we want to study these elliptic curves and their associated groups with one additional condition: that the points are rational, i.e. have coordinates that are rational numbers (a/b). For each curve with rational parameters (i.e. the coefficients of the polynomial are rational), we want to study the rational points of this curve.

For some elliptic curves, there is a finite number of points, so the associated group is a finite commutative group.

For other elliptic curves, however, there are infinitely many rational points, and mathematicians have wanted to classify their structure.

A foundational result in number theory known as the Mordell-Weil theorem states that the group of rational points on an elliptic curve over a number field (such as the rationals, ℚ) is finitely generated. In other words, although there may be infinitely many points, they can be expressed as a finite set of points (known as "generators") combined under the group operation. This structure forms what is called a "finitely generated abelian group", which can be decomposed into a direct sum of a finite subgroup (called the "torsion") and a free part of rank r, where r is called the "rank" of the elliptic curve.

This rank "r" essentially measures the "size" of the free part of the group and has deep implications in both theoretical and computational number theory. For example, if r=0, the group is finite, meaning that the set of rational points on the curve is limited to a finite collection. When r>0, there are infinitely many rational points, which can be generated by combining a finite number of points.

So the challenge is to find a curve with a large number of generators. All of these computations (for a given curve at least) are quite explicit, and can be carried out with a bignum library (the numbers tend to get quite large quickly). I used PARI/GP for my thesis.

Sniffnoy 7 hours ago | root | parent |

> - If you intersect an elliptic curve with a straight line, you end up with a polynomial in one variable, of degree 3 (in general). Since a polynomial of degree 3 has 3 solutions (in the appropriate context), this means that if you have two points on the curve, and you draw a line through these two points, there is a third aligned with them which belongs to the curve. So we have an operation on the curve, which to every pair of points associates a third point. This can be explicitly calculated.

> - It can be proven (again, by explicit calculation) that this operation is associative and commutative, and that there is a "zero" element, i.e. that this operation forms a "group".

I feel like it's worth clarifying here that this operation is actually not the group operation, although the group operation is defined in terms of it.

oasisaimlessly 7 hours ago | root | parent |

If you going to contradict someone, be specific about it. What is your "the group operation" and how is this not it? A given mathematical object can have more than one group operation defined for it.

wbl 6 hours ago | root | parent |

In this case there is a negation missing. If a line intersects three points we have A+B+C=0. To get the group law you have to negate a point.

intuitionist an hour ago | root | parent |

Of course for this to make sense you have to have a notion of 0, which is traditionally taken to be the point at infinity (so negation is negating the y-coordinate). It’s been a while since my algebraic geometry classes but IIRC this is just a useful convention.

UI_at_80x24 7 hours ago | root | parent | prev | 

  As a professional and expert I would love to hear your thoughts and opinions on the use of elliptic curve crypto with SSH.  There was a concern (unsure of the validity) that NSA/NIST had compromised the algorithm used and ECC was unfit for 'secure' communication.
2048bit RSA has been deprecated since that declaration and while 4096bit is still viable, the smaller key-size of ed25519 is appealing.

syncsynchalt 5 hours ago | prev | next |

If like me you're interested in the basics of elliptic curves, point addition, and the abelian groups that result then check the first third of my page at https://curves.xargs.org. It only gets you half way to an understanding of this article but might leave you less mystified.

You can also continue through the rest of that page to see how we use this math in cryptography, such as in key exchange.

Noumenon72 9 hours ago | prev | next |

I was going to ask if the math articles from Quanta magazine are a "Matt Levine" situation where only one person can write so well, but I see only six articles by this author there, so maybe it's an editor doing the magic. All I know is this makes math so accessible and that's not easy.

vessenes 7 hours ago | root | parent |

I too love Quanta. It's funded by an extremely wealthy math guy as a public service; they have the luxury of affording excellent journalists who all seem to me to have graduate degrees in the area they cover, but have not lost the power of communication in exchange. Just a very nice gift to the world.

neom 5 hours ago | root | parent | prev |

I was curious about the rich math guy so I looked it up, leaving this here for the next curious person: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Simons :)

DFHippie 4 hours ago | root | parent |

> Simons shunned the limelight and rarely gave interviews, citing Benjamin the Donkey in Animal Farm for explanation: "'God gave me a tail to keep off the flies. But I'd rather have had no tail and no flies.' That's kind of the way I feel about publicity."

I'm glad to read about billionaires with non-poisonous personalities. I'd prefer a world where no individual held such relative power, but next best is a world in which the dreadful oligarchs have foils to balance them out slightly.

perdomon 9 hours ago | prev | next |

I didn't understand anything in that article, but I'm very excited for the record-breakers and other mathematicians involved. Good job, ya'll.

commandlinefan 9 hours ago | root | parent |

I understood a fair bit of it but only because I've been studying elliptic curves for a while - Quanta does a good job of straddling the line between informing and educating, but they usually err on the side of presenting results rather than proving or explaining them.

unnouinceput 7 hours ago | root | parent |

>...but they usually err on the side of presenting results rather than proving or explaining them

And that's exactly what I like about it. They are a news site, hence they present the news. If the news presenters start to chime in you get what you see at CNN / Fox etc, and that's called propaganda, not news. I want news.